A Display of Arminianism
By John Owen
Chapter 12
OF FREE-WILL, THE NATURE AND POWER THEREOF.
Our next task is to take a view of the idol himself, of
this great deity of free-will, whose original being not well known, he is
pretended, like the Ephesian image of Diana, to have fallen down from heaven,
and to have his endowments from above. But yet, considering what a nothing he
was at his first discovery in comparison of that vast giant-like hugeness to
which now he is grown, we may say of him as the painter said of his monstrous
picture, which he had mended or rather marred according to everyone’s fancy,
“Hunc populus fecit,”—it is the issue of the people’s brain. Origen[i][i] [1] is supposed to have brought him first
into the church; but among those many sincere worshippers of divine grace, this
setter forth of new demons found but little entertainment. It was looked upon
but like the stump of Dagon, with his head and hands laid down before the ark
of God, without whose help he could neither know nor do that which is good in
any kind, still accounted but “truncus ficulnus, inutile lignum,”—“a fig-tree
log, an unprofitable piece of wood.” “Incerti patres scamnum facerentne?” The
fathers of the succeeding ages had much debate to what use they should put it,
and though some exalted it a degree or two above its merits, yet the most
concluded to keep it a block still; until at length there arose a stout
champion,[ii][ii] [2] challenging on his behalf the whole
church of God, and, like a knight-errant, wandered from the west to the east to
grapple with any that should oppose his idol; who, though he met with divers
adversaries,[iii][iii] [3] one especially,[iv][iv] [4] who in the behalf of the grace of God
continually foiled him and cast him to the ground, and that in the judgment of
all the lawful judges assembled in councils,[v][v] [5] and in the opinion of most of the
Christian bystanders,[vi][vi] [6] yet, by his cunning insinuation, he
planted such an opinion of his idol’s deity and self-sufficiency in the hearts
of divers, that to this day it could never be rooted out.
Now, after the decease of his
Pelagian worshippers, some of the corrupter schoolmen, seeing him thus from his
birth exposed without shelter to wind and weather, to all assaults, out of mere
charity and self-love built him a temple, and adorned it with natural lights,
merits, uncontrolled independent operations, with many other gay attendances.
But in the beginning of the Reformation,—that fatal time for idolatry and
superstition, together with abbeys and monasteries,—the zeal and learning of
our forefathers, with the help of God’s word, demolished this temple, and brake
this building down to the ground; in the rubbish whereof we well hoped the idol
himself had been so deeply buried as that his head should never more have been
exalted, to the trouble of the church of God, until not long since some curious
wits, whose weak stomachs were clogged with manna and loathed the sincere milk
of the word, raking all dunghills for novelties, lighted unhappily upon this
idol, and presently, with no less joy than did the mathematician at the
discovery of a new geometrical proportion, exclaim, “We have found it! we have
found it!” And without more ado, up they erected a shrine, and until this day
continue offering of praise and thanks for all the good they do to this work of
their own hands.
And that the idol may be free
from ruin, to which in himself they have found by experience that he is
subject, they have matched him to contingency, a new goddess of their own
creation, who, having proved very fruitful in monstrous births upon their
conjunctions, they nothing doubt they shall never want one to set on the throne
and make president of all human actions: so that after he hath, with various
success, at least twelve hundred years, contended with the providence and grace
of God, he boasteth now as if he had obtained a total victory. But yet all his
prevailing is to be attributed to the diligence and varnish of his new
abettors, with (to our shame be it spoken!) the negligence of his adversaries.
In him and his cause there is no more real worth than was when by the ancient
fathers he was exploded and cursed out of the church: so that they who can
attain, through the many winding labyrinths of curious distinctions, to look
upon the thing itself, shall find that they have been, like Egyptian novices,
brought through many stately frontispieces and goodly fabrics, with much show
of zeal and devotion, to the image of an ugly ape.
Yet here observe, that we do not
absolutely oppose free-will, as if it were “nomen inane,” a mere figment, when
there is no such thing in the world, but only in that sense the Pelagians and
Arminians do assert it. About words we will not contend. We grant man, in the
substance of all his actions, as much power, liberty, and freedom as a mere
created nature is capable of. We grant him to be free in his choice from all
outward coaction, or inward natural necessity, to work according to election
and deliberation, spontaneously embracing what seemeth good unto him. Now, call
this power free-will, or what you please, so you make it not supreme,
independent, and boundless, we are not at all troubled. The imposition of names
depends upon the discretion of their inventers. Again; even in spiritual
things, we deny that our wills are at all debarred, or deprived of their proper
liberty: but here we say, indeed, that we are not properly free until the Son
makes us free;—no great use of freedom in that wherein we can do nothing at
all. We do not claim such a liberty as should make us despise the grace of God,[vii][vii] [7] whereby we may attain true liberty
indeed; which addeth to, but taketh nothing from, our original freedom. But of
this after I have showed what an idol the Arminians make of free-will. Only
take notice in the entrance that we speak of it now, not as it was at first by
God created, but as it is now by sin corrupted; yet, being considered in that
estate also, they ascribe more unto it than it was ever capable of. As it now
standeth, according to my formerly-proposed method, I shall show,—first, what
inbred native virtue they ascribe unto it, and with how absolute a dominion and
sovereignty over all our actions they endow it; secondly, what power they say
it hath in preparing us for the grace of God; thirdly, how effectually
operative it is in receiving the said grace, and with how little help thereof
it accomplisheth the great work of our conversion;—all briefly, with so many
observations as shall suffice to discover their proud errors in each
particular.
[viii][viii] [8] “Herein,”
saith Arminius, “consisteth the liberty of the will, that all things required
to enable it to will any thing being accomplished, it still remains indifferent
to will or not.” And all of them at the synod: [ix][ix] [9] “There
is,” say they, “accompanying the will of man an inseparable property, which we
call liberty, from whence the will is termed a power, which, when all things
pre-required as necessary to operation are fulfilled, may will anything, or not
will it;” that is, our free-wills have such an absolute and uncontrollable
power in the territory of all human actions, that no influence of God’s
providence, no certainty of his decree, no unchangeableness of his purpose, can
sway it at all in its free determinations, or have any power with his highness
to cause him to will or resolve on any such act as God by him intendeth to
produce. Take an instance in the great work of our conversion. [x][x] [10] “All
unregenerate men,” saith Arminius, “have, by virtue of their free-will, a power
of resisting the Holy Spirit, of rejecting the offered grace of God, of
contemning the counsel of God concerning themselves, of refusing the gospel of
grace, of not opening the heart to him that knocketh.” What a stout idol is
this, whom neither the Holy Spirit, the grace and counsel of God, the calling
of the gospel, the knocking at the door of the heart, can move at all, or in
the least measure prevail against him! Woe be unto us, then, if when God calls
us our free-will be not in good temper, and well disposed to hearken unto him!
for it seems there is no dealing with it by any other ways, though powerful and
almighty. [xi][xi] [11] “For
grant,” saith Corvinus, “all the operations of grace which God can use in our
conversion, yet conversion remaineth so in our own free power that we can be
not converted; that is, we can either turn or not turn ourselves;” where the
idol plainly challengeth the Lord to work his utmost, and tells him that after
he hath so done he will do what he please. His infallible prescience, his
powerful predetermination, the moral efficacy of the gospel, the infusion of
grace, the effectual operation of the Holy Spirit, all are nothing, not at all
available in helping or furthering our independent wills in their proceedings.
Well, then, in what estate will you have the idol placed? [xii][xii] [12] “In
such a one wherein he may be suffered to sin, or to do well, at his pleasure,”
as the same author intimates. It seems, then, as to sin, so nothing is required
for him to be able to do good but God’s permission? No! For the Remonstrants[xiii][xiii] [13] (as they speak of themselves) “do always
suppose a free power of obeying or not obeying, as well in those who do obey as
in those who do not obey;”—that he that is obedient may therefore be counted
obedient, because he obeyeth when he could not obey, and so on the contrary:”
where all the praise of our obedience, whereby we are made to differ from
others, is ascribed to ourselves alone, and that free power that is in us. Now,
this they mean not of any one act of obedience, but of faith itself, and the
whole consummation thereof. [xiv][xiv] [14] “For
if a man should say, that every man in the world hath a power of believing if
he will, and of attaining salvation, and that this power is settled in his
nature, what argument have you to confute him?” saith Arminius triumphantly to
Perkins; where the sophistical innovator as plainly confounds grace and nature
as ever did Pelagius. That, then, which the Arminians claim here in behalf of
their free-will is, an absolute independence on God’s providence in doing
anything, and of his grace in doing that which is good,—a self-sufficiency in
all its operations, a plenary indifferency of doing what we will, this or that,
as being neither determined to the one nor inclined to the other by any
overruling influence from heaven. So that the good acts of our wills have no
dependence on God’s providence as they are acts, nor on his grace as they are
good; but in both regards proceed from such a principle within us as is no way
moved by any superior agent. Now, the first of these we deny unto our wills,
because they are created; and the second, because they are corrupted. Their
creation hinders them from doing anything of themselves without the assistance
of God’s providence; and their corruption, from doing anything that is good
without his grace. A self-sufficiency for operation, without the effectual
motion of Almighty God, the first cause of all things, we can allow neither to
men nor angels, unless we intend to make them gods; and a power of doing good,
equal unto that they have of doing evil, we must not grant to man by nature,
unless we will deny the fall of Adam, and fancy ourselves still in paradise.
But let us consider these things apart.
FIRST, I shall not stand to
decipher the nature of human liberty, which perhaps would require a larger
discourse than my proposed method will bear. It may suffice that, according to
my former intimation, we grant as large a freedom and dominion to our wills
over their own acts as a creature, subject to the supreme rule of God’s
providence, is capable of. Endued we are with such a liberty of will as is free
from all outward compulsion and inward necessity, having an elective faculty of
applying itself unto that which seems good unto it, in which it is a free
choice; notwithstanding, it is subservient to the decree of God, as I showed
before, chap. 4. Most free it is in all its acts, both in regard of the object
it chooseth and in regard of that vital power and faculty whereby it worketh,
infallibly complying with God’s providence, and working by virtue of the motion
thereof; but surely to assert such a supreme independency and every way
unbounded indifferency as the Arminians claim, whereby, all other things
requisite being pre-supposed, it should remain absolutely in our own power to
will or not to will, to do anything or not to do it, is plainly to deny that
our wills are subject to the rule of the Most High. It is granted that in such
a chimerical, fancied consideration of free-will, wherein it is looked upon as
having no relation to any act of God’s but only its creation, abstracting from
his decree, it may be said to have such a liberty in regard of the object; but
the truth is, this divided sense is plain nonsense, a mere fiction of such an
estate as wherein it never was, nor ever can be, so long as men will confess
any deity but themselves, to whose determinations they must be subject. Until,
then, more significant terms may be invented for this free power in our nature,
which the Scripture never once vouchsafed to name, I shall be content to call
it with Prosper, a [xv][xv] [15] “spontaneous
appetite of what seemeth good unto it,” free from all compulsion, but
subservient to the providence of God. And against its exaltation to this height
of independency, I oppose,—
First, Everything that is
independent of any else in operation is purely active, and so consequently a
god; for nothing but a divine will can be a pure act, possessing such a liberty
by virtue of its own essence. Every created will must have a liberty by
participation, which includeth such an imperfect potentiality as cannot be
brought into act without some premotion (as I may so say) of a superior agent.
Neither doth this motion, being extrinsical, at all prejudice the true liberty
of the will, which requireth, indeed, that the internal principle of operation
be active and free, but not that that principle be not moved to that operation
by an outward superior agent. Nothing in this sense can have an independent
principle of operation which hath not an independent being. It is no more
necessary to the nature of a free cause, from whence a free action must
proceed, that it be the first beginning of it, than it is necessary to the
nature of a cause that it be the first cause.
Secondly, If the free acts of
our wills are so subservient to the providence of God as that he useth them to
what end he will, and by them effecteth many of his purposes, then they cannot
of themselves be so absolutely independent as to have in their own power every
necessary circumstance and condition, that they may use or not use at their
pleasure. Now, the former is proved by all those reasons and texts of Scripture
I before produced to show that the providence of God overruleth the actions and
determineth the wills of men freely to do that which he hath appointed. And,
truly, were it otherwise, God’s dominion over the most things that are in the
world were quite excluded; he had not power to determine that any one thing
should ever come to pass which hath any reference to the wills of men.
Thirdly, All the acts of the
will being positive entities, were it not previously moved by God himself, “in
whom we live, move, and have our being,” must needs have their essence and
existence solely from the will itself; which is thereby made aujto< o>n, a first and supreme
cause, endued with an underived being. And so much to that particular.
Let us now, in the SECOND place,
look upon the power of our freewill in doing that which is morally good; where
we shall find not only an essential imperfection, inasmuch as it is created,
but also a contracted effect, inasmuch as it is corrupted. The ability which
the Arminians ascribe unto it in this kind, of doing that which is morally and
spiritually good, is as large as themselves will confess to be competent unto
it in the state of innocency, even a power of believing and a power of
resisting the gospel, of obeying and not obeying, of turning or of not being
converted.
The Scripture, as I observed
before, hath no such term at all, nor anything equivalent unto it. But the
expressions it useth concerning our nature and all the faculties thereof, in
this state of sin and unregeneration, seem to imply the quite contrary; as,
that we are in “bondage,” Hebrews 2:15; “dead in sins,” Ephesians 2:1, and so
“free from righteousness,” Romans 6:20; “servants of sin,” verse 17; under the
“reign” and “dominion” thereof, verses 12, 14; all “our members being
instruments of unrighteousness,” verse 13; not “free indeed,” until “the Son
make us free.” So that this idol of free-will, in respect of spiritual things,
is not one whit better than the other idols of the heathen. Though it look like
“silver and gold,” it is the “work of men’s hands.” “It hath a mouth, but it
speaketh not; it hath eyes, but it seeth not; it hath ears, but it heareth not;
a nose, but it smelleth not; it hath hands, but it handleth not; feet, but it
walketh not; neither speaketh it through its throat. They that made it are like
unto it; and so is every one that trusteth in it. O Israel, trust thou in the
LORD,” etc., Psalm 115:4-9. That it is the work of men’s hands, or a human
invention, I showed before. For the rest, it hath a mouth unacquainted with the
“mystery of godliness,” “full only of cursing and bitterness,” Romans 3:14;
“speaking great swelling words,” Jude 16; “great things, and blasphemies,”
Revelation 13:5; a “mouth causing the flesh to sin,” Ecclesiastes 5:6;—his eyes
are blind, not able to perceive those things that are of God, nor to know those
things that are “spiritually discerned,” 1 Corinthians 2:14; “eyes before which
there is no fear of God,” Romans 3:18;—his “understanding is darkened, because
of the blindness of his heart,” Ephesians 4:18; “wise to do evil, but to do
good he hath no knowledge,” Jeremiah 4:22; so that without farther light, all
the world is but a mere “darkness,” John 1:5;—he hath ears, but they are like
the ears of the “deaf adder” to the word of God, “refusing to hear the voice of
charmers, charming never so wisely,” Psalm 58:5; being “dead” when his voice
first calls it, John 5:25; “ears stopped that they should not hear,” Zechariah
7:11; “heavy ears” that cannot hear, Isaiah 6:10;—a nose, to which the gospel
is “the savor of death unto death,” 2 Corinthians 2:16;—“ hands full of blood,”
Isaiah 1:15; and “fingers defiled with iniquity,” chap. 59:3;—feet, indeed,
but, like Mephibosheth, lame in both by a fall, so that he cannot at all walk
in the path of goodness; but “swift to shed blood, destruction and misery are
in his ways, and the way of peace hath he not known,” Romans 3:15-17. These,
and divers other such endowments and excellent qualifications, doth the
Scripture attribute to this idol, which it calls “The old man,” as I shall more
fully discover in the next chapter. And is not this a goodly reed whereon to
rely in the paths of godliness? a powerful deity whereunto we may repair for a
power to become the sons of God, and attain eternal happiness? The abilities of
free-will in particular I shall consider hereafter; now only I will, by one or
two reasons, show that it cannot be the sole and proper cause of any truly good
and spiritual act, well-pleasing unto God.
First, All spiritual acts
well-pleasing unto God, as faith, repentance, obedience, are supernatural;
flesh and blood revealeth not these things: “Not of blood, nor of the will of
the flesh, nor of the will of man; but of God,” John 1:13; “That which is born
of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit,” John
3:6. Now, to the performance of any supernatural act it is required that the
productive power thereof be also supernatural; for nothing hath an activity in
causing above its own sphere. “Nec imbelles generant feroces aquilas columbae.”
But our free-will is a merely natural faculty, betwixt which and those
spiritual, supernatural acts there is no proportion, unless it be advanced
above its own orb, by inherent, habitual grace. Divine, theological virtues,
differing even in the substance of the act from those moral performances about
the same things to which the strength of nature may reach (for the difference
of acts ariseth from their formal objects, which to both these are diverse),
must have another principle and cause above all the power of nature in civil
things and actions morally good, inasmuch as they are subject to a natural
perception, and do not exceed the strength of our own wills. This faculty of
free-will may take place, but yet not without these following limitations:—First,
That it always requireth the general concurrence of God, whereby the whole suppositum
in which free-will hath its subsistence may be sustained, Matthew 10:29,
30. Secondly, That we do all these things imperfectly and with much
infirmity; every degree, also, of excellency in these things must be counted a
special gift of God, Isaiah 26:12. Thirdly, That our wills are
determined by the will of God to all their acts and motions in particular; but
to do that which is spiritually good we have no knowledge, no power.
Secondly, That concerning which
I gave one special instance, in whose production the Arminians attribute much
to free-will, is faith. This they affirm (as I showed before) to be inbred in
nature, everyone having in him from his birth a natural power to believe in
Christ and his gospel; for Episcopius denies that [xvi][xvi] [16] “any
action of the Holy Spirit upon the understanding or will is necessary, or
promised in the Scripture, to make a man able to believe the word preached unto
him.” So that it seems every man hath at all times a power to believe, to
produce the act of faith upon the revelation of its object: which gross
Pelagianism is contrary,—
First, To the doctrine of
the church of England, alarming that a man cannot so much as prepare himself by
his own strength to faith and calling upon God, until the grace of God by
Christ prevent him, that he may have a good will.—Artic. 10.
Secondly, To the
Scripture, teaching that it is “the work of God that we do believe,” John 6:29.
It is “not of ourselves; it is the gift of God,” Ephesians 2:8. To some “it is given
to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven,” Matthew 13:11. And what is
peculiarly given to some cannot be in the power of everyone: “To you it is
given in the behalf of Christ to believe on him,” Philippians 1:29. Faith is
our access or coming unto Christ; which none can do “except the Father draw
him,” John 6:44; and he so draweth, or “hath mercy, on whom he will have
mercy,” Romans 9:18. And although Episcopius rejects any immediate action of
the Holy Spirit for the ingenerating of faith, yet St. Paul affirmeth that
there is no less effectual power required to it than that which raised Christ
from the dead; which, sure, was an action of the almighty Godhead. “That ye may
know,” saith he, “what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who
believe, according to the working of his mighty power, which he wrought in
Christ, when he raised him from the dead,” Ephesians 1:18-20. So that, let the
Arminians say what they please, recalling that I write to Christians, I will
spare my labor of farther proving that faith is the free gift of God; and their
opposition to the truth of the Scripture in this particular is so evident to
the meanest capacity that there needs no recapitulation to present the sum of
it to their understandings.
ENDNOTES:
[xvii][xvii] [1] Hieron. ad Ruff
[xviii][xviii] [2] “Pelagius: Dogma quod—Pestifero
vomuit coluber sermone Britannus.”—Prosper. de Ingrat., cap. 1.
[xix][xix] [3] Adfuit, exhortante Deo provisa per
orbem, Sanctorum pia cura patrum:—1. Pestern subeuntem Prima recidit, Sedes
Roma Petri. 2. Non segnior inde, orientis Rectorum cura emicuit. Synod. Palest.
3. Hieronymus libris valde excellentibus hostem Dissecuit. 4. Atticus
Constantinop. 5. Duae Synodi Africanae.”—Prosper. de Ingrat.
[xx][xx] [4] “Concilium cui dux Aurelius ingeniumque
Augustinus erat. Quem Christi gratia cornu Uberiore rigans, nostro lumen dedit
aevo.”—Prosp., ibid.
[xxi][xxi] [5] “Dixit Pelagius, quis est mihi
Augustinus? Universi acclamabant blasphemantem in episcopum, ex cujus ore,
dominus univerae Africae, unitatis indulserit felicitatem, non solum a conventu
illo, sed ab omni ecclesia pellendum.”—Oros. Apologet., p. 621, de Synod.
Palest.“Prae omnibus studium gerite libros. S. Aug. quos ad Prosp. et Hilar.
scripsit, memoratis fratribus legendos iugerere,” etc.—Epist. Synod. Byzac.
[xxii][xxii] [6] “Imo noverunt, non solum Romanam
Africanamque ecclesiam, sod per omnes mundi partes, universae promissionis
filios, cum doctrina hujus viri, sicut in tota fide, ita in gratiae confessione
congruere.”—Prosp. ad Rufin. “Augustinum sanctae recordationis virum pro vita
sua, et meritis, in nostra communione semper habuimus, nec unquam hunc
sinistrae suspicionis saltem rumor suspexit.”—Coelest., Epist. Ad Gal. Episcop.
These I have cited to show what a heavy prejudice the Arminian cause lies
under, being professedly opposite to the doctrine of St. Austin, and they
continually slighting of his authority.
[xxiii][xxiii] [7] Homo non libertate gratiam, sed
gratia libertatem, assequitur.”—Aug.
[xxiv][xxiv] [8] “Libertas Arbitrii consistit in eo,
quod homo, positis omnibus requisitis ad volendum, indifferens tamen sit, ad
volendum vel nolendum, hoc vel illud.”—Armin. Art. Perpend., p. 11.
[xxv][xxv] [9] “Voluntatem comitatur proprietas
quaedam inseparabilis, quam libertatem vocamus; a qua voluntas dicitur
potentia, quae positis omnibus praerequisitis ad agendum necessariis, potest
velle et nolle, aut velle et non velle.”—Remon. in Act. Synod, p. 16.
[xxvi][xxvi] [10] “Omnes irregeniti habent Lib.
Arbit. et potentiam Spiritui Sancto resistendi, gratiam Dei oblatam repudiandi,
consilium Dei adversus se contemrendi, evangelium gratiae repudiandi, ei qui
cot pulsat non aperiendi.”—Armin. Artic. Perpend.
[xxvii][xxvii] [11] “Positis omnibus operationibus
gratiae, quibus Deus in conversione nostri uti possit, manet tamen conversio
ita in nostra potestate libera, ut possimus non converti; hoc est, nosmet ipsos
convertere vel non convertere.”—Corv, ad Bog., p. 263.
[xxviii][xxviii] [12] “Non potest Deus Lib. Arbit.
integrum servare, nisi tam peccare hominem sineret, quam bene agere.”—Corv, ad
Molin., cap. 6.
[xxix][xxix] [13] “Semper Remonstrantes supponunt
liberam obediendi potentiam et non obediendi; ut qui obediens est idcirco
obediens censeatur, quia cum possit non obedire obedit tamen, et e
contra.”—Rem. Apol., p. 70.
[xxx][xxx] [14] “Quod si quis dicat omnes in
universum homines, habere potentiam credendi si velint, et salutem consequendi:
et hanc potentiam esse naturae hominum divinitus collatam, quo tuo argumento
eum confutabis?”—Armin. Antip., p. 272.
[xxxi][xxxi] [15] “Lib. Arbit. est rei sibi placitae
spontaneus appetitus.”—Prosp, ad Collat., cap. 18, p. 379.
[xxxii][xxxii] [16] “An ulla actio S. S. immediata in
mentem aut voluntatem necessaria sit, aut in Scriptura promittatur ad hoc, ut
quis credere possit verbo extrinsecus proposito, negativam tuebimur.”—Episcop.,
Disput. Privat.
http://www.sounddoctrine.net/